This site is from a past semester! The current version will be here when the new semester starts.

Week 7 [Fri, Sep 17th] - Project

iP:

  1. [Optional] Get more out of the iP

tP: v1.1

  1. Do a practice iteration midnight before the tutorial
  2. Update project website: AboutUs, README
  3. Update the UG
  4. Update the DG: user stories, glossary, NFRs, use cases
  5. Plan the next iteration
  6. Start implementing the next version

iP

1 [Optional] Get more out of the iP

If you wish to cite the iP in your resume, you can do more to make it look more impressive to a potential employer. These improvements are not considered for grading and can be done after the semester is over. Some ideas:

  • Improve the GUI: Make the UI look nicer, unique, and memorable. You can get inspiration from what others have done (but remember to give credit if you reuse any code from them).
  • Add a demo video or an animated gif to your user guide to show how the app works.
  • Improve code quality: iP is the right size to cite as an example of your code quality. You can use the RepoSense link (</>) in the iP showcase page to point to your iP code.
  • Add more features.

On a somewhat related note, you can also create similar product websites for your other projects (projects from other modules, pet projects).

tP: Get ready for iterations

1 Do a practice iteration midnight before the tutorial

  • To get some practice of doing project iterations, do this week's tP work (i.e., updates to various documents) as if it is a project iteration that will reach a milestone v1.1, as explained in the pane below.

  • Don't forget to 'wrap up' the milestone at the end of this week (as explained in the panel above), after the work is done.

2 Update project website: AboutUs, README

Recommended procedure for updating docs:

  1. Divide among yourselves who will update which parts of the document(s).
  2. Update the team repo by following the recommended workflow.

Update the following pages in your project repo:

  • AboutUs page: This page (in the /docs folder) is used for module admin purposes. Please follow the format closely or else our scripts will not be able to give credit for your work.
    • Add your own details. Include a suitable photo as described here.
    • There is no need to mention the the tutor/lecturer, but OK to do so too.
    • The filename of the profile photo should be docs/images/githbub_username_in_lower_case.png
      Note the need for lower case (GitHub usernames are not case sensitive, but URLs in GitHub-pages are -- to avoid any mismatches, we have fixed the file name here to be lower casewhy lowercase?) e.g. JohnDoe123 -> docs/images/johndoe123.png not docs/images/JohnDoe123.png.
      If your photo is in jpg format, name the file as .png anyway.
    • Indicate the different roles played and responsibilities held by each team member. You can reassign these roles and responsibilities (as explained in Admin Project Scope) later in the project, if necessary.

  • README page: Update it to match your project.

    • Add a UI mockup of your intended final product. Note that the image of the UI should be docs/images/Ui.png so that it can be downloaded by our scripts. Limit the file to contain one screenshot/mockup only and ensure the new image is roughly the same height x width proportions as the original one. Reason: when we compile these images from all teams into one page (example), yours should not look out of place.
      If you did the above update correctly, UI mock up and profile photos should appear in your project website and this Project List Page.

    • Update all contents to match your own project.

    • Update the link of the GitHub Actions build status badge (Build Status) so that it reflects the build status of your team repo.

    • Acknowledge the original source of the code e.g.,
      This project is based on the AddressBook-Level3 project created by the [SE-EDU initiative](https://se-education.org).

  • Update site-wide settings as described in the guide Using Jekyll for project documentation @SE-EDU/guides.
    The text AB-3 in docs\_sass\minima\_base.scss needs updating too (it comes into play when you convert documentation to PDF formats).

3 Update the UG

  • Move the draft UG content into the User Guide page in your repository. Update the content as necessary. If a feature is not implemented in the current version, you can either omit it from the UG or mark it as 'Coming soon' (e.g., ## Archiving contacts [coming soon]).
    As mentioned before, while it is more convenient for one person to update the entire UG, we recommend that each person updates their own part of the docs so that we can easily track the contribution of each member using RepoSense.

4 Update the DG: user stories, glossary, NFRs, use cases

  • Add the following to the DG, based on your project notes from the previous weeks.
    Some examples of these can be found in the AB3 Developer Guide.

    • Target user profile, value proposition, and user stories: Update the target user profile and value proposition to match the project direction you have selected. Give a list of the user stories (and update/delete existing ones, if applicable), including priorities. This can include user stories considered but will not be included in the final product.
    • Use cases: Give use cases (textual form) for a few representative user stories that need multiple steps to complete. e.g. Adding a tag to a person (assume the user needs to find the person first)
    • Non-functional requirements: Note: Many of the given project constraints can be considered NFRs. You can add more. e.g. performance requirements, usability requirements, scalability requirements, etc.
    • Glossary: Define terms that are worth recording.

The above DG sections should cover the full requirements of the product, some of which might not get implemented by the end of this semester. Furthermore, these sections will be graded at the final project evaluation, and any bugs in the content can cost you marks at that point. The panel below gives some relevant DG bug examples you can lookout for:

5 Plan the next iteration

  • Plan the next iteration. As you know, you should follow the breadth-first iterative process. Therefore, first you must decide what functionalities should be in the product if you had only two weeks to implement it. You have done that already when you chose user stories for v1.2, translated that to features, and even drafted the UG based on those features. You can tweak that plan further at this point if you wish, given that you now have some idea of how fast the team can work when using the prescribed workflow.
    • Aim to produce a working MVP at the end of this iteration even if the functionalities are not polished (polishing can be done in a later iteration).
    • [Recommended, Optional] Break the iteration into two increments i.e., aim to produce an even simpler but working version after one week.
    • Avoid depth-first implementations: "I'll do the back-end part of feature X in this iteration" is not acceptable as that is not in the spirit of breadth-first iterative process. Remember, we are pretending this to be the last iteration; why would you implement the back-end part of a feature in the last iteration?
      It is OK to add simpler versions of bigger features, but not OK to add partial features that can't be used yet.
  • Divide the work among the team members i.e., the work required for the current iteration.
  • Reflect the above plan in the issue tracker by assigning the corresponding issues (create new issues if necessary) to yourself and to the corresponding milestone. For example, the user story pertaining to the increment show a place holder for photo, showing a generic default image should be assigned to Jake and to milestone v1.2
    If you split the iteration into two smaller iterations of one-week each (recommended), name the first one v1.2 and the second one v1.2b so that the dashboard can track them accurately. The reason for naming the earlier milestone as v1.2 is so that even if you fail to finish the second one, you can still get credit for reaching v1.2 (which is the milestone tracked by grading scripts) -- think of the first iteration as minimal deliverables for v1.2 and the second one as containing do-if-there-is-time improvements.

6 Start implementing the next version

  • If you have time, start implementing v1.2.